This article has evidence gaps. Read the research notes before relying on its conclusions.
Research cutoff: · Updated:The merchant-facing intermediary
In Iran, the term pardakht-yar identifies a payment-facilitation model rather than simply any website displaying a payment button. TechRasa Insight’s industry report places these companies between merchants and payment service providers, commonly abbreviated as PSPs. It describes their role as making access to electronic-payment services easier and identifies contractual relationships with PSPs and Shaparak as part of the framework. These are the report’s descriptions; the current regulator-issued documents were not independently retrieved for this draft. s1
The report also warns that inconsistent market-share information prevented a defensible ranking of participants. Its company map should therefore not be read as a league table. That limitation matters in a sector where a provider’s visibility or advertising does not establish its share of transactions. s1
[s1]What the service can add
ZarinPal describes itself as a payment facilitator and advertises connections to multiple PSP gateways, routing, plugins, and developer documentation. These materials illustrate how a facilitator can package merchant integration and gateway access into a single service. They establish what this company offers publicly, rather than independently measured improvements in sales, reliability, or approval rates. s2
A merchant-facing service and a national payment network are different parts of the arrangement. A facilitator’s checkout branding therefore does not, on its own, explain the full processing chain or establish that funds have reached the merchant. This distinction is especially useful when comparing a provider’s commercial description with its technical documentation. s1 s2
[s1] [s2]Following a documented payment request
ZarinPal’s connection guide describes a request containing a merchant identifier, amount, description, and return address. After receiving a payment-request reference, the merchant redirects the buyer to checkout. The buyer subsequently returns to the merchant’s specified callback address. This is an example of one provider’s documented integration, not a universal contract for Iranian facilitators. s3
Verification is a separate concern. ZarinPal documents both automatic verification and merchant-initiated verification with the PSP. Its explanation also addresses situations where a buyer does not reach the callback page. Accordingly, a return-page visit and confirmation of payment are different events in this documented workflow. Settlement into the merchant’s account requires separate evidence. s4
[s3] [s4]Establishing current permissions
This page does not certify any company’s current regulatory standing. A complete account requires the authoritative participant register, effective rules, and applicable settlement documentation. The available material supports an explanation of the intermediary model and an example integration, while leaving those current legal and operational questions open.
Sources & research notes
- [s1] Iran FinTech 1404: Payment Facilitation IndustryTechRasa Insight · PDF page 5, market-map caveat; PDF page 6, definition and contractual framework · Accessed 2026-10-27
- [s2] ZarinPal: Internet Payment Gateway ServicesZarinPal · Opening description, smart routing, internet payment gateway, and developer sections · Accessed 2026-10-27
- [s3] Guide to Connecting to the ZarinPal Internet GatewayZarinPal · Sending information; redirecting the buyer; returning to the merchant website · Accessed 2026-10-27
- [s4] Transaction Verification: Automatic and ManualZarinPal · Opening explanation and metadata.auto_verify behavior · Accessed 2026-10-27
limitations
- Current Shaparak rules and the authoritative participant register were not inspected because the official site timed out.
- TechRasa Insight is industry research with disclosed participant involvement and sponsorship; its descriptions do not replace primary regulatory documents.
- Undated provider documentation was inspected on 2026-10-27. Its exact availability and wording at the 2026-10-26 cutoff remain unverified, including the diagrammed behavior.
- The provider example does not establish sector-wide behavior or measured service quality.
unverified items
- Current facilitator eligibility requirements and company-specific agreement validity.
- Current merchant onboarding, tax-registration, business-category, and identity-verification requirements.
- Current settlement-account arrangements, schedules, fees, complaint procedures, and service restrictions.
data gaps
- No comparable annual facilitator transaction, merchant-count, revenue, or market-share series was verified for 2012–2026.
- The inspected industry report explicitly identifies inconsistent market-share evidence; no rankings or annual trends have been inferred.
coverage period
The industry report labeled Solar Hijri 1404 and undated provider documentation inspected on 2026-10-27.