Skip to content
SOCIETY, POPULATION & SOCIAL CHANGE / FIELD NOTE

New Towns

Iran's new towns are planned settlements intended to accommodate housing demand and redistribute metropolitan growth. Research on their development highlights the difficulty of matching residential construction with employment, infrastructure, public services, and functioning regional connections.

LEVEL 03Part of a connected cultural guide
Research in progress

This article has evidence gaps. Read the research notes before relying on its conclusions.

Research cutoff: · Updated:

Planning beyond the existing city

A new town is a deliberately planned settlement, rather than simply a recently built neighborhood. In Iran, the policy has sought to accommodate population growth and housing demand while redirecting development beyond established metropolitan centers. A study of Pardis traces the national initiative to 1985 and identifies Pardis, Hashtgerd, Andisheh, and Parand as examples associated with the Tehran metropolitan area. These names describe distinct settlements, rather than interchangeable districts of Tehran. s1

The policy's ambitions extended beyond supplying residential plots. They included decentralization, employment creation, and the organization of regional growth. That broader purpose matters when assessing results: occupied apartments alone cannot establish whether a settlement has developed an employment base or reduced dependence on its neighboring metropolis. This distinction follows from the objectives and implementation problems discussed in the Pardis settlement study. s1

[s1]

Why planned capacity and settlement can diverge

Mohammad Mehdi Azizi's comparative study reports that Pardis attracted population less successfully than nearby settlements during the period examined. It identifies land-allocation bureaucracy, insufficient infrastructure and public facilities, weak coordination among government organizations, and an unclear employment policy as contributing explanations. These are findings about a particular historical comparison, not a measurement of conditions in every Iranian new town today. s1

The comparison also shows why development cannot be understood solely within a planned boundary. Households can choose neighboring settlements, and regional growth can continue outside the places designated to receive it. An assessment therefore needs to examine the surrounding settlement system as well as the new town itself. s1

[s1]

From housing projects to functioning towns

A broader review by Maysam Basirat and Parsa Arbab examines Iran's first generation of new towns and proposals for a subsequent generation. It describes persistent dependence on metropolitan centers and shortages of infrastructure and facilities. It also connects accelerated settlement with Mehr Housing, a state housing program that began in 2007. The program and the new-town policy overlapped, but they were not identical: one concerned housing provision, while the other concerned the development of settlements. s2

The authors contrast official confidence in continued new-town development with scholarly criticism of its performance. Their recommendations should be read as proposals for policy revision, rather than evidence that those changes have subsequently been implemented. s2

Taken together, these studies suggest a practical way to read the landscape: ask how residential development connects to employment, public facilities, and the wider metropolitan region. A town's planned population is a capacity or ambition; it is not automatically an observed population, and it should not be plotted as if it were one. s1s2

[s1] [s2]

Sources & research notes

  1. [s1] An Analysis of Population Settlement Trend in New Towns: The Case Study of Pardis New Town, IranICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning · Abstract; proceedings citation, pages 519–534; repository publication date · Accessed 2026-10-28
  2. [s2] Analysing New Town Development in Iran: Toward a New AgendaInternational Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development · Abstract; Introduction; Analysing the First Generation of New Towns in Iran; Table 1 notes; footnote 1 · Accessed 2026-10-28

limitations

  • The Pardis source was inspected at abstract level; detailed tables and the underlying study period were not verified.
  • The national review was published in 2022 and does not establish implementation outcomes at the editorial cutoff.
  • The account is weighted toward Tehran's metropolitan region.

unverified items

  • The current national inventory and legal status of designated new towns.
  • Recent town-level occupancy, employment, service provision, and transport outcomes.
  • Implementation of proposals described as a second generation of new-town development.

data gaps

  • No comparable annual town-level population or occupancy series covering 2012–2026 was verified.
  • Planning capacities were not treated as observed populations, and isolated historical figures were not converted into an annual trend.

coverage period

Policy origins in 1985 and historical assessments published in 2020 and 2022; current outcomes through 2026-10-26 remain unverified.

Continue the story

THE VISUAL FIELD GUIDEEveryday culture & urban spacesExplore the illustrated perspective